Tag: smith v doe
-
The modern sex offender registry rests on one dangerous legal fiction: that the registry is not punishment. That fiction did not appear by accident. It was cemented by the United States Supreme Court in Smith v. Doe, the 2003 case that allowed Alaska’s sex offender registry law to be applied retroactively because the Court classified…
-
The sex offender registry was sold to the public as a forward-looking safety tool. In reality, it is a textbook violation of one of the oldest and clearest protections in the entire Constitution: the Ex Post Facto Clause. Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution is unambiguous: “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto…
-
The sex offender registry was sold to you as something that only affected “them.” The politicians and judges promised it was just a “civil regulatory scheme” — nothing more than a harmless list to keep the public informed. No big deal, right? Wrong. That single polite-sounding lie quietly murdered one of the oldest and most…
-
The sex offender registry was sold to you as a tool aimed only at “those people” — the monsters, the predators, the ones who deserve it. “It doesn’t affect normal Americans,” they said. “It’s just for public safety.” Bullshit. Every single “civil regulatory scheme” ruling that propped up the registry has quietly rewritten the Constitution…