-
Politicians and judges love to reassure everyone: “Don’t worry, the sex offender registry is only for the worst of the worst — the real monsters who deserve lifelong public shaming.” It sounds tough, responsible, and targeted. It’s also complete bullshit. The registry is a sloppy, indiscriminate dragnet that scoops up kids, teenagers, and people who…
-
The sex offender registry was sold to the public as a targeted safety measure. One of its most destructive features is the effective death of the constitutional right to travel. Residency bans, combined with endless in-person reporting requirements, reporting of every address change, vehicle, and job, and the constant threat of new felony charges, make…
-
Judicial Farce #9 reveals how the sex offender registry escapes 8th Amendment scrutiny for cruel and unusual punishment. Lifetime public shaming, banishment via residency bans, constant surveillance, and family destruction are ignored because judges call it ‘civil regulation’ instead of what it really is — state-sponsored cruelty.
-
Judicial Farce #8 exposes the registry’s total due process failure: no individualized hearing, no evidence, just automatic lifetime public shaming based solely on conviction. The Supreme Court in Connecticut DPS v. Doe declared ‘conviction alone is enough’ — turning the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments into optional suggestions while families are destroyed.
-
Judicial Farce #6 exposes how judges cite the Mendoza-Martinez test then completely ignore it to uphold the sex offender registry as a ‘civil regulatory scheme.’ Dozens of parole-style restraints (address reporting, in-person verifications, residency bans, fees, public shaming) plus new felony charges for violations — far worse than real parole — yet courts wave the…
-
Here it is — the single most dishonest three-word phrase in the entire registry farce: “civil regulatory scheme.” Judges have been chanting it like a mantra for twenty-plus years, as if repeating the magic words somehow turns lifetime public shaming, parole-style surveillance, and felony traps into something harmless and constitutional. It all started with Smith…
-
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court finally looked at the registry’s treatment of children and did something almost unheard of in this entire farce: it told the state to knock it off. In a series of rulings culminating in Commonwealth v. Torsilieri and related juvenile cases (most notably the 2020–2023 line of decisions striking down lifetime SORNA…
-
For once — just once — some federal judges actually looked at the sex offender registry with honest eyes instead of reflexively waving the magical “public interest” wand. In Does v. Snyder, 834 F.3d 696 (6th Cir. 2016), the Sixth Circuit took a hard, unflinching look at Michigan’s ever-harsher Sex Offenders Registration Act (SORA) amendments…
-
Politicians and judges can’t stop patting themselves on the back: “Public notification makes communities safer! Megan’s Law lets everyone know who the bad guys are!” It’s their favorite shiny badge of “public interest” — the feel-good line they trot out every time someone questions the registry. The truth is uglier and bloodier: Megan’s Law-style public…
-
Politicians, cable news, and every “think of the children” crusader love to hammer the same terrifying story: “Most sex crimes are committed by strangers on the registry — just check the website and your family is safe!” It’s the ultimate Stranger-Danger Hoax, the boogeyman fairy tale that keeps the public clicking, scared, and compliant. The…